The existing message was a bit confusing and made me think that the AUR package
had an update pending which Yay refused to do. I realized instead that the package is
actually *flagged* out of date on the AUR.
I then realized there is a section in the README specifically about this confusion.
So, by prefixing the word "Flagged" I think the slight confusion can be eliminated, and the
README section possibly removed.
depOrder.Aur contains the order in which AUR packages are to be
installed. While depOrder.bases contains the actual package data
organized by pkgbase.
deoOrder.AUR is kind of counterintuitive, as it only contains one
package from each package base.
For example if you were to install libc++{,abi,experimental},
depOrder.Aur would only contain one of those packages, which one
actually being quite random. depOrder.Bases[pkg.Pkgbase] will then be
looked up and everything under that slice would be installed.
This means that the only real use depOrder.Aur has, is to give the
pkgbase. So to cut out the middleman, lets merge .Aur and .Bases into
a single field.
Doing this has also heped to spot som subtle bugs:
Fix subtle split package errors.
The number menus now correctly list and respect (installed) for bases
that have atleast one of their packages installed.
Entering package names in number menus now always expects the pkgbase
name instead of the random package which happened to make it into .Aur.
--rebuild and --redownload correctly handles split packages.
formatPkgbase is also used more.
Only pass the packages belonging to the desired pkgbase. Before our
entire list of every pkgbase had to be passed, as well as an example
package from the base we are looking for.
This lets use use formatPkgBase easier in other places outside of
install.
Many of the functions in install could also be simplified in a similar
way, although that has not been done in this commit.
The order of targets does somewhat matter. For example doing something
like 'pacman -S db1/foo db2/foo' should cause the second package to be
skipped.
The order of targets also effects in which order they are resolved. This
should make errors more reproducable if any ever occur.
