The check was checking for an empty string in `matrix_jitsi_prosody_auth_internal_accounts`,
which is unlikely to happen. We should check for an empty list instead.
The check was not validating username/password values, so telling the user that they need a non-empty
username/password is misleading. It was merely checking if there's at least one entry in the list.
This patch adjusts the check and message accordingly.
Until now, we were leaving services "enabled"
(symlinks in /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/).
We clean these up now. Broken symlinks may still exist in older
installations that enabled/disabled services. We're not taking care
to fix these up. It's just a cosmetic defect anyway.
I changed the conditional statement in prosody systemd template to bind the localhost port by default if people have set ```matrix_nginx_proxy_enabled == false ```.
Hopefully that should make it the default behaviour now.
Jitsi-meet enabled websockets by default, claiming better reliability.
Matrix-nginx-proxy configuration has been set up according to the
Prosody documentation: https://prosody.im/doc/websocket
These are just defensive cleanup tasks that we run.
In the good case, there's nothing to kill or remove, so they trigger an
error like this:
> Error response from daemon: Cannot kill container: something: No such container: something
and:
> Error: No such container: something
People often ask us if this is a problem, so instead of always having to
answer with "no, this is to be expected", we'd rather eliminate it now
and make logs cleaner.
In the event that:
- a container is really stuck and needs cleanup using kill/rm
- and cleanup fails, and we fail to report it because of error
suppression (`2>/dev/null`)
.. we'd still get an error when launching ("container name already in use .."),
so it shouldn't be too hard to investigate.
Some people run Coturn or Jitsi, etc., by themselves and disable it
in the playbook.
Because the playbook is trying to be nice and clean up after itself,
it was deleting these Docker images.
However, people wish to pull and use them separately and would rather
they don't get deleted.
We could make this configurable for the sake of this special case, but
it's simpler to just avoid deleting these images.
It's not like this "cleaning things up" thing works anyway.
As time goes on, the playbook gets updated with newer image tags
and we leave so many images behind. If one doesn't run
`docker system prune -a` manually once in a while, they'd get swamped
with images anyway. Whether we leave a few images behind due to the lack
of this cleanup now is pretty much irrelevant.
